Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add filter to count pixel tracks for beta star 90m run #23437

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 5, 2018

Conversation

JanFSchulte
Copy link
Contributor

Adds a filter to count pixel tracks at HLT needed for high beta star run.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2018

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @JanFSchulte (Jan-Frederik Schulte) for master.

It involves the following packages:

HLTrigger/special

@Martin-Grunewald, @silviodonato, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

fwyzard commented Jun 4, 2018

@JanFSchulte do you need the HLTFilter-specific functionality of saving the candidates ?
Otherwise it would simpler to write an edm::global::EDFilter.

bool accept = (numTracks >= min_pixelTracks_);
if(max_pixelTracks_ > 0)
accept &= (numTracks <= max_pixelTracks_);
std::cout << numTracks << std::endl;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No cout, please use a LogDeug or LogInfo.

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

This filter does not use the functionality of an HLTFilter, so should be a normal EDFilter.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2018

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2018

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-23437/5017

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying a patch in https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-23437/5017/git-diff.patch
e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-23437/5017/git-diff.patch | patch -p1

You can run scram build code-checks to apply code checks directly

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2018

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2018

Pull request #23437 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @silviodonato, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard can you please check and sign again.

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 5, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/28462/console Started: 2018/06/05 10:37

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 5, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 5, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 5, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

@JanFSchulte
We would need a 101X backport PR!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 5, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23437/28462/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 31
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2902471
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2902280
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 190
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 30 files compared)
  • Checked 128 log files, 14 edm output root files, 31 DQM output files

@JanFSchulte
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Martin-Grunewald See #23485 for the backport.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Jun 5, 2018

@JanFSchulte @Martin-Grunewald where is this filter effectively tested?

@JanFSchulte
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fabiocos studies using this filter have been shown at the TSG last week https://indico.cern.ch/event/733179/contributions/3024006/attachments/1658757/2656741/CMSTOTEM_TSGmeeting_30May2018_Robert.pdf slide 6ff

The layer counting works as expected and the thresholds are being tuned.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Jun 5, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 6958d9d into cms-sw:master Jun 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants